Legal Opinion
Zwick v. Goldberg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 16, 1939PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover from the estate of one Goldberg, his father-in-law, for money alleged to have been collected and retained by Goldberg while he was an employee of the plaintiff. The original defendants were the three administrators of the estate of Goldberg. One of them, Annie Zwick, was the plaintiff’s wife. At the close of the evidence, the defendants’ motions to dismiss the action and to direct a verdict for them were denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and leave was reserved to enter a verdict for the defendants. The defendants excepted to the refusal to…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- McCarthy v. William H. Wood Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Matheson v. O'KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Daddario v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Massachusetts Turnpike Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Charney v. CharneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.