Legal Opinion
Worthington v. Waring
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 3, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
We take the substance of the petition to be that the petitioners were weavers by trade, and had been employed by the Narragansett Mills, a corporation in Fall River, and that they demanded higher wages, which the corporation refused to give; that they then left work, and that the defendants, who were the treasurer and superintendent of the corporation, sent their names to the officers of other mills in Fall River on a list which is called a black list, which informed these officers that the petitioners had left the Narragansett Mills on what is called a strike; and that thereupon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Carleton v. RuggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Raymond v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Cone Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Burnham v. DowdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- McArthur Bro's v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Cornellier v. Haverhill Shoe Manufacturers' Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.