Legal Opinion

Kuzel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The issues involved on this appeal are: (1) Whether the trial court was correct in holding, as a matter of law, that, plaintiff-appellant Joseph Kuzel and the driver Ronald Dewey were engaged in a joint enterprise at the time of the collision; (2) whether appellant, not having previously attacked the testimony of the expert witness on motions after verdict, is barred from doing so on appeal, and (3) whether this court should order a new trial in the interest of justice.

The record reveals the following facts: Kuzel’s complaint charged Janz with negligence as to speed, management and control,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Sommerfield v. FluryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Brubaker v. Iowa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Krause v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. Estate of WhistlerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bach v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kiggins v. MacKyolWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kuzel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API