Bach v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Five issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Is there credible evidence to support the jury’s finding as to causal negligence of Hamlin ?
2. Were Bach and Rickert engaged in a joint enterprise as a matter of law ?
8. Were the damages awarded to Bach for personal injuries excessive?
4. Was the award for loss of earnings up to the time of trial excessive?
5. Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?
Causal Negligence of Hamlin.
The first issue presented is whether there is credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that Hamlin was causally negligent. The crucial question is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Moritz v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Fahrenberg v. TengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Hults v. TillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Redepenning v. DoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.