Legal Opinion
Cobb v. O'CONNELL
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 2005No. A109101PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 Cal.Rptr.3d 170 (2005)
134 Cal.App.4th 91
Paul COBB et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Jack O'CONNELL, Defendant and Respondent.
No. A109101.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Five.
October 25, 2005.
As Modified November 18, 2005.
Daniel Mark Siegel, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Amy Elizabeth Bisson-Holloway, Dept. of Education/Legal Ofc., Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Respondent.
Certified for Partial Publication.[*]
STEVENS, J.
Appellants are Oakland residents and taxpayers, who contend that the California Legislature's passage of special remedial legislation in 2003, which was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moss v. KronerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Jauregui v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Satyadi v. West Contra Costa Healthcare DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Mendoza v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Alameda County Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee v. Roadway Electrical Works Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010