Mendoza v. State
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Mayors in certain large cities around the country have been granted control of the school districts in those cities. Antonio Villaraigosa, the Mayor of the City of Los Angeles (the Mayor), sought similar control over the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) through state legislation. The California Constitution grants to the voters within the LAUSD the right to determine whether their board of education is to be elected or appointed. Therefore, the Legislature could not simply enact a statute granting the Mayor authority to appoint the members of the LAUSD Board of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State Board of Education v. HonigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Grigsby v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People Ex Rel. Pierson v. Superior Court of El Dorado CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- San Francisco Unified School District v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.