Legal Opinion

Century-National Insurance v. Garcia

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2011No. S179252PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

At issue in this case is a fire insurance policy that contains clauses excluding coverage for losses caused by the intentional act or criminal conduct of “any insured.” The question is whether, based on these exclusion clauses, the insurer properly prevailed on a demurrer to the cross-complaint of two allegedly innocent insureds who suffered losses when their son, a coinsured under the policy, intentionally set fire to their home. We conclude the answer is no, because the clauses impermissibly reduce coverage that is statutorily mandated. We therefore reverse the judgment of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Michelle Postell v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. California Fair Plan Ass'n v. GarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. American National Property and Casualty v. Tara and James ClendenenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Rojas v. Platinum Auto Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. GuilloryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API