Legal Opinion

Cothran v. Benjamin Cleenewerck & Son

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 77PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment on a claim of damages for personal injuries occasioned by the negligence of the defendants. A motion for a new trial was refused and the defendants brought error. At the time of the accident the defendant Blanchard was a salesman for Benjamin Cleenewerck & Son, and was driving an automobile belonging to them. The plaintiff was driving a Ford truck loaded with household goods along the Ravine road near Kalamazoo. He had stopped at the extreme right of the traveled portion of the road to examine a tire. When he was ready to start the car it was necessary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People v. BurbankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eldredge v. SargentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Patt v. DilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Curtiss v. FahleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Barrett v. Nash Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. D. & H. Truck Line v. HopsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API