Legal Opinion

Curtiss v. Fahle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1943No. 35,836PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a rear-end collision between a car in which plaintiff was riding and a truck. Plaintiff prevailed and defendants have appealed. Appellants are John Fahle, owner of the truck, which was operating as a common carrier of property under permit issued by the state corporation commission, and the National Mutual Casualty Company, a corporation which had issued to John Fahle a liability policy of insurance covering his operations as a common carrier of property. The policy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Bush v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Robinson v. ShortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Eldredge v. SargentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Giles v. TernesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Lawrence v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Siruta Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Siruta v. SirutaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. Cullip Ex Rel. Pitts v. Domann Ex Rel. DomannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API