Legal Opinion

Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1965No. 686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

It is now settled by the opinions rendered on the prior appeals: (1) The complaint states a cause of action; (2) the city had not, when the last appeal was heard, established its right to consummate five of the items which it had agreed to perform as a part of its contract with the Commission. These five items are enumerated in the opinion reported 262 N.C. 306, 137 S.E. 2d 115. It is there said:

“ [A] s much as we would like to finally dispose of this litigation without further delay, there are five items for which the City intends to claim credit that will necessitate further inquiry,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Williams v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. South Atlantic Waste Co. v. Raleigh, Charlotte & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Jacobs v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CornellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Morse v. CurtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Neuman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Davis v. ChauffeursCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API