Jacobs v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Winboene, C.J.:
The sole question presented for decision is whether or not the lower court erred in sustaining the respondent’s demurrer ore tenus. The question thus presented involves a question of pleading which has been the subject of many decisions of this Court.
The office of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a pleading, ad mitting, for the -purpose, the truth of factual averments well stated and such relevant inferences of fact as may be deduced therefrom. Furthermore, pleadings challenged by a demurrer are to be construed liberally with a view to substantial justice between the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Williams v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Allen v. Carolina Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Neuman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965