Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1961No. 17PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winboene, C.J.:

The sole question presented for decision is whether or not the lower court erred in sustaining the respondent’s demurrer ore tenus. The question thus presented involves a question of pleading which has been the subject of many decisions of this Court.

The office of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a pleading, ad mitting, for the -purpose, the truth of factual averments well stated and such relevant inferences of fact as may be deduced therefrom. Furthermore, pleadings challenged by a demurrer are to be construed liberally with a view to substantial justice between the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Williams v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Allen v. Carolina Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Neuman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API