Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoepker

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided September 29, 1954No. Crim. A. No. 18094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

Armand Fred Hoepker was indicted for refusing to report for civilian work as ordered by his draft board in violation of Section 462, Title 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix. He waived a jury trial in writing, with consent of the government and approval of this court. Rule 23(a) of Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 18 U.S.C.A. He stipulated in writing he refused to report and the Selective Service System file be admitted in evidence.

Mr. Hoepker now maintains that he should be acquitted for the following reasons :

1. The local board and appeal board erred in failing to classify the defendant 4-D, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Imboden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. United States v. PittCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Armand Fred Hoepker, United States of America v. Walter Gail Thomas, United States of America v. Edward L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. BartellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. United States v. Von NiedaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API