Legal Opinion
Steinbuch v. Cutler
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 2006No. Civil Action 05-970 (PLF/JMF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to me for resolution of all discovery disputes. Currently before me are plaintiffs oral motion to disqualify counsel, Plaintiffs Motion to Compel [# 47], defendant’s Motion to Extend Discovery [#49] (“Motion to Extend”), and Defendant’s Motion to Deem Rule 36 Requests Admitted, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Alternative Motion to Preclude Evidence [# 62] (“Defendant’s Motion to Compel”). For the reasons stated below, I will recommend plaintiffs motion to disqualify counsel be denied, Plaintiffs Motion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- In Re BelliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Lucas v. SpellingsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sai v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- American Property Construction Company v. Sprenger Lang FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Marino v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.