Legal Opinion
Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2008No. Civil Action 07-279(RCL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now comes before this Court defendants’ Motion to Disqualify Opposing Counsel [Klayman] [21]. Upon consideration of defendants’ motion [21], plaintiffs opposition [29], plaintiffs supplemental memorandum [30] and defendants’ reply [31], all applicable law and the entire record herein, plaintiffs’ motion [21] will be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Peter Paul (“Paul”) filed the instant suit against Judicial Watch and the named defendants on February 6, 2007, alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of the standards of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington County Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- In Re American Airlines, Inc., Amr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Headfirst Baseball LLC v. ElwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. HusisianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ambush v. EngelbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Keith v. KeithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.