Legal Opinion
Lucas v. Spellings
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 10, 2006No. CIV.A. 01-2393JMFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
By my Order of September 28, 2004, I demanded that plaintiffs counsel, John F. Karl, Jr. (“Karl”), show cause why he had not violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(3) in making certain factual contentions in the documents he submitted on behalf of his client in opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defs.MSJ”).
Karl has retained counsel, Stephen C. Leckar, who has entered his firm’s appearance as “attorneys for John F. Karl, Jr.” Mr. Leckar has filed, on his client’s behalf, a Response to Order to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lucas v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Steinbuch v. CutlerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Carswell v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Cox v. Swiss-American, Inc. (In re Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2012
- Bender v. JordanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.