Legal Opinion

In re Bell Telephone Co.

Ohio Public Utilities Commission

Decided December 30, 1954No. 24517PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*296OPINION

For Authority to increase rates and charges and to change its Exchange Rate Tariff, P. U. C. O. No. 1, its General Exchange Tariff. P. U. C. O. No. 3, its Message Toll Telephone Service Tariff, P. U. C. O. No. 6, its Private Line Tariff, P. U. C. O. No. 1, and its Tele-typewriter Tariff, P. U. C. O. No. 2.

I. History of Proceeding

On December 18, 1953, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, applicant herein, filed with this commission an application seeking the authorization of the commission to increase rates and charges for telephone service rendered by it within the state of Ohio.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cafferkey v. Turner Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Eicher v. United States Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sopkovich v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gross v. Western-Southern Life Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API