Sopkovich v. Ohio Edison Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The question that has been certified for our consideration is: “For purposes of determining when a property owner owes a duty of care to an employee of an independent contractor, does the property owner ‘actively participate’ in the performance of the employee’s work by exercising exclusive control over an aspect of the employee’s working environment?” . For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified question with a qualified “yes.”
The court of appeals held that for purposes of determining whether a property owner owes a duty of care to the employees of an independent contractor,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hirschbach v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cafferkey v. Turner Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Bond v. Howard Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Hanna v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Michaels v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Lillie v. MeachemOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Barnett v. Beazer Homes Investment, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Frost v. Dayton Power and Light CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Oliphant v. AWP, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Abbott v. Jarrett Reclamation Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.