Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Town of Pinedale

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2000No. 98-291PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

The Appellants, taxpayers and water service purchasers (collectively Cooper), challenge the authority of the Town of Pinedale (Town) to borrow money from the State of Wyoming for the purpose of reconstructing the municipal water system. The district court ruled that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 15-1-103(a)(xlii)(Michie 1997) 1 was a specific statute affording such authority to the Town, and it also ruled that the question had become moot because of the construction of the water system. We hold that the matter had not become moot, but we agree with the district court that the Town possessed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fund for Animals v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Scarlett v. Town Council, Town of Jackson, Teton CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  4. WW Enterprises, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Statement of Termination of Davis v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hesse v. Town of Jackson, Wyo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to AGS and AMLD, Minor Children. SASWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API