WW Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Cheyenne
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAUTZ, District Judge.
This appeal questions whether counties and municipalities may establish different hours when liquor licensees may be open for business. The City of Cheyenne set more restrictive hours for Sunday liquor sales than surrounding Laramie County did. Appellant, a city licensee, challenged the City of Cheyenne’s hours, arguing that appellant was denied equal protection. The district court dismissed appellant’s challenge to the City of Cheyenne’s ordinance setting hours when its liquor licensees may be open for business on Sundays. We affirm the district court’s action.
I. ISSUES
A…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Herrig v. HerrigWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Edgcomb v. Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Statement of Termination of Davis v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Cooper v. Town of PinedaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Amoco Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to AGS and AMLD, Minor Children. SASWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Robinson v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.