Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2010No. 2009-T-0061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy P. Cannon, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellants, Murray A. Miller (“Murray”), Sam H. Miller (“Sam H.”), and Trumbull Industries, Inc., appeal from the May 29, 2009 judgment entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, finding Trumbull Industries in contempt.

*460{¶ 2} The following facts and procedural history were taken from appellants’ last appeal with this court, Miller v. Miller, 11th Dist. No. 2008-T-0076, 2009-Ohio-2092, 2009 WL 1176916.

{¶ 3} Trumbull Industries sells plumbing supplies, including vitreous china. Two sets of cousins own Trumbull Industries’ common stock: brothers Murray and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stepak v. ScheyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. MD Acquisition, L.L.C. v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. JAMES RIVER MANAGEMENT CO., INC. v. KehoeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Magnus Int'l Grp., Inc. v. Forster, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API