Legal Opinion

Stepak v. Schey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1990No. 88-1940PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a complaint alleging breach of fiduciary duty and challenging the price per share paid in *10a cash-out merger must be brought under R.C. 1701.85, the appraisal statute.

Plaintiff-appellee contends that “a claim that the directors of a corporation breached their fiduciary duty to obtain the best price obtainable for all of the shareholders when the company was being marketed for sale is not preempted by the appraisal statute, R.C. 1701.85.”

For the reasons that follow, we hold that an action for breach of fiduciary duty may be maintained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Steinberg v. Amplica, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Mullen v. Academy Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Walter J. Schloss Associates v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Johnson v. LamprechtOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hershey v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Grace Bros. v. Farley Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lewis v. Celina Financial Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API