Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2012No. 2011-0024Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as Miller v. Miller, 132 Ohio St.3d 424,

2012-Ohio-2928.] MILLER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. MILLER, APPELLANT. Cite as Miller v. Miller, 132 Ohio St.3d 424,

2012-Ohio-2928.] Corporations—Directors—R.C. 1701.13(E)—Corporation’s duty to advance expenses to director for costs incurred in litigation to which director is party by reason of position with corporation—Corporation cannot escape duty to advance expenses by claiming director’s alleged misconduct violated fiduciary duties—Corporation’s duty to advance expenses arises when director executes undertaking described in R.C. 1701.13(E)(5)(a)—…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  5. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API