Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1990No. 10-88-05511; CA A50109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery. ORS 164.415. He contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury:

“If you find that a firearm was pointed at another within firing range, then you are permitted but you are not required to infer that the firearm was loaded.”

The Supreme Court approved a virtually identical instruction in State v. Vance, 285 Or 383, 591 P2d 355 (1979). Six years later, the Supreme Court took a new look at instructions on inferences in State v. Rainey, 298 Or 459, 693 P2d 635 (1985), where the defendant had been convicted for knowingly delivering a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. VanceOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API