Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Potamkin-Auerbach Chevrolet, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-3465PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLAK, District Judge.
This action, brought by Anna Bolden against Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc., and Fidelity Consumer Discount Company, Inc., 1 arises from the purchase and financing of a 1974 Chevrolet Impala. The complaint sets forth three claims. The first claim charges that defendants violated the Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., by failing to make certain disclosures with respect to credit extended to plaintiff to enable her to purchase the Impala. The second claim charges that defendants violated the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Sales and Finance Act, 69 P.S. § 601 et seq., by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pekular v. EichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Laubach v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Laubach)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Deetz v. Nationwide Mutual Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1981
- Dezaiffe v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1984