Legal Opinion

Pekular v. Eich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1986No. 00865 and 00866PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This cross-appeal presents two questions for our determination: (1) whether the enactment of the Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA) 1 bars an insured from pursuing a private cause of action against his insurer based upon a theory of common law fraud and deceit; and (2) whether the enactment of UIPA bars an insured from pursuing a private cause of action against his insurer based on the provisions of the Unfair Trade Practices Consumer Protection Law (CPL). 2

The insureds, Karin and Frank Pekular, instituted the present action by filing a three-count complaint…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Highmark, Incorporated v. Upmc Health Plan, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. EricksenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Gordon v. Pennsylvania Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API