Legal Opinion

Deetz v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided March 23, 1981No. 1197 S of 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

DOWLING, J.,

In an automobile accident, defendant, Nationwide, was the insurer of both vehicles and now finds itself on a collision course with one of its insureds. Plaintiff, Earl Deetz, is suing his carrier in both assumpsit and trespass asserting a series of improper and/or unethical practices in connection with the adjustment of his claims. He alleges in essence, and for purposes of this opinion such averments are ac*500cepted as verity, that representatives of Nationwide tricked him into signing a release for $25,000 and that on several occasions improperly terminated payment of work loss…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Bowman v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Gurnick v. Government Employees InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. D'Ambrosio v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API