Legal Opinion

Piedmont Southern Life Insurance v. Gunter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1963No. 40189, 40190PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

In support of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the general grounds of its motion for new trial, the defendant contends that the evidence showed conclusively that the plaintiff wife in procuring coverage by the group policy knowingly concealed material facts of her husband’s medical history, which concealment amounted in law to actual fraud, that the other elements of defense of fraud were proved, and therefore a verdict for the defendant was demanded. The Georgia courts have held that an employer who obtains a group insurance policy covering its employees is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cotton States Life Insurance v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Missouri State Life Insurance v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Neider v. Continental Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  5. Adams v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Buffalo Insurance v. Star Photo Finishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America v. RiedlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Joseph Alton Bowers v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API