Legal Opinion

Adams v. Washington Fidelity National Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1934No. 23152PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Although an insurance policy may contain a provision that “no agent has authority to change this policy or to waive any of its provisions,” and that “no change in the policy shall be valid unless approved by an executive officer of the company and such approval be indorsed hereon,” the provisions of the policy may be changed by the ■ conduct of the company, through its authorized agents, amounting to a waiver of the provisions of the policy, which, when accepted and acted upon by the insured, amount to a change of the contract. A provision of a policy may be altered by a course of dealings…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Cotton States Life Insurance v. LesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Lester v. Piedmont & Arlington Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Jewell-Loudermilk Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Alliance Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rosario v. Atlantic Southern Ins.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
  2. Piedmont Southern Life Insurance v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. NessmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. National Life & Accident Insurance v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API