Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Emerson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1999No. 98-1744PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s pattern of neglect and misrepresentation coupled with his cavalier attitude towards the disciplinary proceedings establishes his present unfitness to practice law in Ohio. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Supreme Court of Ohio v. Bertche (In Re Bertsche)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. RankeOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. TomsonOhio Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API