Legal Opinion
Hill v. Raffone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 18, 2007No. AC 27717PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Kenny Hill, appeals from the judgments of the trial court, rendered in favor of the defendants Joseph A. Raffone 1 and 119 Olive Street, LLC, after a trial to the court in this consolidated action sounding in contract for the sale of real property. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court abused its discretion by refusing to order specific performance. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) improperly applied the election of remedies doctrine, (2) incorrectly found that it would be difficult for the court to fashion and enforce an order for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gendelman v. MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Emigrant Mortg., Co., Inc. v. D'AgostinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. DaSilvaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Jaramillo v. CaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Chambers v. SilerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. BioHealth Labs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Pack 2000, Inc. v. CushmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015