Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of Hume

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 36,791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Petition for the dissolution of Fitzjohn. Manufacturing Company (herein called defendant) was filed in the circuit court for the county of Muskegon, and a receiver was appointed July 13, 1931. F. E. Cruikshank & Company, a New York corporation (herein called plaintiff), presented its claim for allowance in the sum of $23,772.80. From a disallowance of this claim it has appealed.

In August, 1929, plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Fitzjohn Company for installing in its manufacturing plant a sprinkler equipment and for coverage of the same by fire insurance. The contract provided for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Patterson v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. D. F. Broderick, Inc. v. Continental Credit Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Galion Iron Works & Manfg. Co. v. Service Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mills Novelty Co. v. MorettMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Boloven v. NicholsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Ballard v. MacKinac Island Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API