Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1929No. Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 34,275PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtttzel, J.

Defendant Miller sold defendant Martin 40 unimproved lots in the city of Detroit, Michigan, for the sum of $60,000, and received upon delivery of the deed $9,000 in cash and a purchase-money mortgage for $51,000. Nothing was said in the deed to the effect that it was given subject to a purchase-money mortgage. Martin, before closing with Miller, had taken the abstracts showing title in his grantor to the office of the Investment Mortgage Company, Inc., of which plaintiff Patterson is secretary and treasurer, and with whom he had negotiated a loan of $20,000 to be secured by six mortgages on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Owens v. GraetzelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  2. McEvoy v. Security Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Ardis v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Greenough v. WillcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Stuart v. WordenMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colton v. DuvallMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lower v. Muskegon Heights Co-Operative DairyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Higbie v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Mills Novelty Co. v. MorettMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API