State v. Purdy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from the denial of relief in a posteonviction proceeding, appellant argues that because his sentence expired before it was amended to include a conditional release term, the posteonviction court abused its discretion by denying his motion for an order stating that his sentence had expired and he was not resentenced. We reverse.
FACTS
In 1994, appellant Bradley Allan Purdy pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1994). On December 7, 1994, the district court imposed a 36-month…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martinek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. FransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. HannamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025