Legal Opinion

State v. Purdy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1999No. C2-98-1136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from the denial of relief in a posteonviction proceeding, appellant argues that because his sentence expired before it was amended to include a conditional release term, the posteonviction court abused its discretion by denying his motion for an order stating that his sentence had expired and he was not resentenced. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1994, appellant Bradley Allan Purdy pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1994). On December 7, 1994, the district court imposed a 36-month…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. King v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. State v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. FransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  4. State v. HannamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API