Legal Opinion

King v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1997No. C1-96-2337PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Justice.

Appellant Scott Nolan King was convicted of first-degree murder on December 18, 1992 and his conviction was affirmed by this court on March 11, 1994. During his trial, the state submitted expert evidence that DNA in King’s blood matched DNA found in semen samples taken from the victim’s body. The district court did not hold a Frye hearing and King’s counsel did not object to the admission of DNA evidence. On July 31, 1996, King filed a petition for postconviction relief contending that the district court erred in not holding a Frye hearing, that King’s trial counsel was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. A.C. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. BrocksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Campos v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API