Legal Opinion

Calumet Refining Co. v. Star Lubricating Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1924No. 4148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

Tbe appellant («plaintiff below) seeks judgment for tbe amount of a trade acceptance executed by respondent (defendant below) for merchandise sold by appellant to respondent. The answer admits tbe making and delivery of tbe trade acceptance. As an affirmative defense, and by way of counterclaim, tbe respondent claims damages, for braecb of a contract alleged to have been made between appellant and respondent on or about September 6, 1921, for tbe sale of certain lubricating oils.

Tbe case was tried to tbe court without a jury. Tbe court found that respondent was indebted to appellant in tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Western Roofing Tile Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Cavender v. WaddinghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Grimsrud Shoe Co. v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bennett v. CummingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lawrence Construction Co. v. HolmquistUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Federal Security Insurance Company v. Joseph L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API