International Harvester Co. of America v. Donaldson
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
Appellant brought its action in this case, to recover from appellee the sum of $90 and attorney’s fees alleged to be due upon a negotiable promissory note of which said appellant claimed to be the bona fide owner and holder in due course, for value, and before maturity thereof.
Defendant filed his plea of non est factum, among other pleas to the complaint upon which issue was joined.
The trial of the case in the court below appears to have been based entirely upon the plea of the defendant that he did not sign the note sued upon.
No exceptions were reserved to any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hatfield v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Jackson Lumber Co. v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Dees v. Lindsey Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Ross Neely Motor Express, Inc. v. RobinsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Morgan Plan Co. v. BeverlyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. MooreAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948