Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. Moore
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
The complaint in this cause counts on simple negligence. The plea, in short by consent, of course, includes the defense of contributory negligence.
In the court below there was a judgment in favor of the defendant.
The case arose out of a collision between a passenger bus of the plaintiff and a cattle truck of the defendant.
The only question presented for our review is the propriety vel non of the trial judge’s action in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. The stated ground is that the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.
The record discloses that there…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Francis v. Imperial Sanitary Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- William E. Harden, Inc. v. HardenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Ray v. BrannanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Sorrell v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henley v. LollarAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950