Legal Opinion

Ross Neely Motor Express, Inc. v. Robinson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1950No. 7 Div. 81PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

Edward Robinson filed suit against Ross Neely Motor Express, claiming property damages.

In the court below there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The damage was occasioned by a collision between Robinson’s automobile and a truck. The prime factual issue revolves around the inquiry of whether or not this was the appellant’s truck.

The collision occurred at about dark between Birmingham and Gadsden, at a point about one mile south of Springville. Appellee, his wife, and some small children were traveling north towards Gadsden. The truck was proceeding in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Slayton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Providence HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Roughton v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Ross Neely Motor Express, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Killian v. WebberAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API