Legal Opinion

Uhl v. Wexford Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 37,885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Appellee sold refrigerating equipment to the Wexford Company in May, 1929, for the sum of $6,375, part of which was paid in cash and the balance to be paid in 18 monthly instalments. A balance of $2,291, represented by 12 promissory notes, dated from May 26, 1931, to September 26, 1932, and falling due from December 26, 1932, to May 26, 1933, was in default on January 3, 1934, at the time the Grand Rapids Trust Company was appointed receiver of the Wexford Company.

The contract was not recorded and contained the following provisions:

“And in case you…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wiggins v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Galion Iron Works & Manfg. Co. v. Service Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ikovich v. Silver Bow Motor Car Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Ikovich v. Silver Bow Motor Car Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API