Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Snow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. ' The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant and one Max Schimmeyer entered into a contract, by which Schimmeyer agreed to construct and deliver to defendant a whirligig complete, with all its appurtenances, for the sum of $1,900, $500 in cash, and the balance in monthly payments of $100 each. The contract contained certain other conditions, immaterial to the issue here. It also contained the following:

“The title in and to said whirligig is to be and remain in said Max Schimmeyer until all the payments, interest mentioned herein, are fully paid."

Defendant paid Schimmeyer something over $900 in cash. Schimmeyer did not fulfill…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Adams v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Dunlap v. GleasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hill v. Michigan National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Uhl v. Wexford Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API