Wisner v. Field
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Ransom County; Lauder, J. Action by James E. Wisner and Clarence B. Wisner against William H. Field. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
In June, 1882, plaintiff and defendant entered into and executed the following contract, viz.: “The following agree-men is made and entered into this first day of June, 1882, between William H. Field, of Port Chester, N. Y., and James E. Wisner, of Lisbon, Dakota. The said Field now holds seven contracts for *258land with the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, bearing date April 26th, 1882, and numbered as follows and for the following sections of land: * * * It is hereby mutually agreed between the said W. H. Field and Jas. E. Wisner that all payments that have been made or shall be made on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Levi v. KarrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Lewis v. MoffettIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
- Major v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Cramer v. BachmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Olivier v. UlebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Williams v. PedersenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- McMillan v. ConatNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902