Legal Opinion

Olivier v. Uleberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1946No. File 7003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Ch. J.

This is an action for a dissolution of a general partnership and an accounting between the partners. A dissolution was decreed and an accounting had. The appeal is limited to one item which the court held to be properly chargeable against the appellant Olivier in the distribution of the assets.. The plaintiff Olivier appeals from the judgment and demands a trial anew of the question of fact embodied in the seventh Finding of Fact, which reads as follows: “ ‘That heretofore and from and after the 16th day of December, 1942, the said George Olivier abandoned the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lay v. EmeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Miller v. HaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Shirley v. StraubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Wisner v. FieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Valentin v. SarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Thomas Richard Tarnavsky v. Morris Tarnavsky Edward TarnavskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Engstrom v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Froemming v. Gate City Federal Savings & Loans Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API