Williams v. Pedersen
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Irwin, J., entered October 18, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an fiction for the dissolution of a partnership, and for an accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
This is an action between partners for an accounting, settlement, and dissolution. The partners conducted a logging business upon the Nema river, in Pacific county, Washington. The partnership at first consisted of the plaintiff, Williams, and the defendants, Pedersen and Hansen. After the firm business had continued a few weeks, Hansen dropped out, and it is conceded that thenceforward he was out of the firm; and that, during the time he was with them, the partnership, composed of the three, cut and placed in the river seventy-eight thousand feet of logs, one-third of the net proceeds of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reily v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
- Major v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Scott v. BoydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Smith v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wisner v. FieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weizer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Bemiss v. Widows' & Orphans' Home of the Christian ChurchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Efner v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Pershing v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Harrah v. DyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.