Legal Opinion

Reutter v. Weber

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 30, 2007No. 06SA79PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

Plaintiffs Duane and Patty Reutter have sued Drs. Kevin Weber and Matthew Sump-ter and Pueblo Cardiology Associates, P.C. (collectively, “Defendants”) for malpractice based on what they allege to have been negligent medical treatment given to Mr. Reutter in January 2002. In this original proceeding, the Reutters seek relief from a trial court order allowing Defendants to interview on an informal basis other medical providers who were involved in Mr. Rentier's treatment but who are not parties to this suit. Under the trial court’s ruling, these interviews would be permitted to take place…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Alcon v. SpicerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Brown v. GuiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Danielson v. DennisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Johnson v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, L.L.C. ApartmentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Holman v. RASAKMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ortega v. Colorado Permanente Medical GroupSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Acierno Ex Rel. Acierno v. GaryfallouColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. In re Bailey v. HermacinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API