Legal Opinion

Holman v. RASAK

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2010No. Docket 137993PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*432Corrigan, J.

We granted leave to consider whether the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 42 USC 1320d et seq., permits ex parte interviews by defense counsel with treating physicians under a qualified protective order. We hold that ex parte interviews, which are permitted under Michigan law, are also consistent with HIPAA regulations, provided that “reasonable efforts have been made ... to secure a qualified protective order that meets the requirements of [45 CFR 164.512(e)(l)(v)].” 45 CFR 164.512(e)(l)(ii)(B). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Domako v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.M., Minor Child. Heather Thomas, Subpoenaed WitnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Caldwell v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State Ex Rel. Proctor v. MessinaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence StavishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Szpak v. InyangMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API