Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Bares
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 2004No. S-02-1475PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Hamako I. Hamilton brought this medical malpractice action against Dr. Harold R. Bares, alleging that she suffered damages resulting from Bares’ treatment of her vision problems. The district court overruled motions for directed verdict made by both parties. The jury was unable to reach a verdict, and the court declared a mistrial. The court overruled Bares’ motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and Bares appeals.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
On a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the moving party is deemed to have admitted as true all the relevant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Eccleston v. ChaitNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Neill v. HemphillNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Capps v. ManhartNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thone v. Regional West Medical CenterNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Cerny v. LongleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Curran v. BuserNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Scurlocke v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Chapin v. Neuhoff Broadcasting-Grand Island, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.