Legal Opinion

Capps v. Manhart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1990No. 88-353PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and subsequent motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial. Plaintiff-appellant, Ruth Capps, brought suit against defendant-appellee, Dr. Mark Manhart, for dental malpractice. Capps’ charges of negligence against Dr. Manhart involve three areas of dentistry: periodontal (gum disease), restorative (bridgework), and endodontic (root canal). The first area focuses on Dr. Manhart’s use of calcium hydroxide as a part of the treatment provided for Capps’ periodontal disease. Second, Capps complains that the bridgework that Dr. Manhart planned…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dotzler v. TuttleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hegarty v. Campbell Soup Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Crewdson v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kortus v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hanzlik v. PaustianNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BaresNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Keystone Ranch Co. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Robinson v. BleicherNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bobbitt v. Allied-Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Carson v. SteinkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API