Legal Opinion
Connertin v. Concannon
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Section 10119, Or. L., provides:
“If any person by last will devise any real estate to any person for the term of such person’s life, and after Ms death, to his or her children or heirs, or right heirs in fee, such devise shall vest an estate for life only in such devisee, and remainder in fee simple in such children.”
By virtue of the above provision and the terms of the will in question, before proceeding- further we are constrained to hold that Thomas David Connertin received a life estate only in the property involved herein. See, also, Estate of Reinbrecht, 116 Or. 184 (240 Pac. 223),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gildersleeve v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Stubbs v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Soules v. SilverOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Towndrow's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Reed v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Beneux v. Brown Shoe CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Ahlemeyer v. MillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- State Land Board v. NortinOregon Supreme Court · 1945