Legal Opinion

Ahlemeyer v. Miller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 12, 1937Published

1Opinion of the Court

Egan, V. C.

The parties to this suit have agreed that the facts herein, upon which decision is sought, are as follows:

“The only issue in this controversy now pending before the court in this case is; Who is entitled to receive the moneys now on deposit with the clerk of this court, which represent that part of the lands, which, under the deed made by Mary Elizabeth Miller and husband to George Miller and wife, were *470conveyed to the heirs-at-law of said George Miller, and subsequently sold under these proceedings?
“1. On May 1st, 1868, Mary Elizabeth Miller became seized in fee-simple of certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Ætna Life Insurance v. HoppinIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Forrest v. PorchTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McKinney v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  5. Howell v. GiffordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API