Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Land Board v. Nortin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1945Published

1DissentKelly, J.

As I understand it, the opinion of the court is to the effect that the language of subdivision (6) of Sec tion 16-101, O. C. L. A., -which is the statute of descent, and the language of Section 1 of Chapter 15 of Deady’s General Laws of Oregon, 1845-1864, p. 719, not only justify but require us to hold that if the charge of matricide is proven, a collateral kinswoman, namely, a sister of the intestate, became an heir of the intestate. I cannot concur in such a holding.

It is also stated in the opinion of the court that if we adhere to the holding of our former opinion in this case (175 Or.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Carpenter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. McAllister v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Wall v. PfanschmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Shellenberger v. RansomNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API